Showing posts with label Lori Jepson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lori Jepson. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Making the case for Killdeer Mountains

Making the case for Killdeer Mountains



We are deeply concerned that Basin Electric Power Cooperative is proposing to construct new transmission lines and a 12-acre substation along the south face of the Killdeer Mountains. We are asking the Public Service Commission to reject this location for the following reasons:
-- The Killdeer Mountains are important to all North Dakotans for historic, archaeological, environmental, cultural and recreational reasons.
-- The mountains are one of 40 sites recently identified by Gov Jack Dalrymple and the Industrial Commission as deserving special protection.
-- The mountains hold deep significance for the Mandan, Hidatsa, Lakota, Dakota and other local tribes.
-- The proposed transmission line would negatively impact the view and experience of the Killdeer Mountains from surrounding highways, one of which is a North Dakota Scenic Byway.
-- The proposed line would pass within the boundaries of the historic Killdeer Mountain Battlefield as identified by the National Park Service. The substation and part of the transmission line would be in the core battlefield area.
-- Basin Electric’s archaeological finding of “no significant cultural sites” was based on the state Historic Preservation Office records for the battlefield boundaries, which are currently being updated and amended.
-- Funding has recently been approved for a major two-year study of the Killdeer Mountain Battlefield area. North Dakotans deserve to know the outcomes of this study before a decision is made that impacts the area.
-- Basin Electric now wants approval of a second transmission line to meet the needs of the oil and gas industry, and that second line is the alternative listed in its original proposal. This means its proposal no longer includes the “range of reasonable alternatives” required by the National Environmental Policy Act.
-- In addition, the entire environmental impact statement required by NEPA is still in draft stage and should be completed before a final decision is made.
For these reasons, we are asking the PSC to reject the present proposal. We invite anyone else who is concerned about this to voice their concerns at the Public Service Commission hearing at Killdeer City Hall today  at 9:30 a.m. MDT, or write directly to the Public Service Commission.
(Rob Sand and Lori Jepson are coordinators for the Killdeer Mountain Alliance.)

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Alliance fights to protect Killdeer Mountains from drilling

Published August 15, 2013, 07:15 AM

Alliance fights to protect Killdeer Mountains from drilling

Rob Sand has one last hope. As part of the Killdeer Mountain Alliance, he has worked to protect the mountains he grew up hunting and riding horses on from oil drilling.
By: Katherine Lymn, Forum News Service
KILLDEER, N.D. -- Rob Sand has one last hope.
As part of the Killdeer Mountain Alliance, he has worked to protect the mountains he grew up hunting and riding horses on from oil drilling.
His group represents archaeologists, historians, hunters, Native Americans and biologists who are concerned about the area where the soil is untilled and “rich with possibility,” said Mary Sand, Rob’s wife.
The North Dakota Industrial Commission in January approved drilling in the area, and then squashed an appeal. The southwest section of the “school lands” now has wells, but the alliance is still working to prevent that from spreading to the southeast end.
It’s running out of time, too. The area it wants to protect is already staked for wells.
Now, the alliance is taking a more grassroots approach, sending a letter to Gov. Jack Dalrymple and gathering supporters on a Facebook page. Members hope the Industrial Commission, which Dalrymple serves on with Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem and Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring, will visit the site as part of a state effort to protect historical sites from drilling.
Because of their busy schedules, the commission members plan to tour sites individually, and Karlene Fine, executive director of the Industrial Commission, said they may have already started.
Citizens added sites to the list in various ways, from letters like the Killdeer Mountain Alliance’s to a conversation with a commission member, Fine said.

Protecting western N.D.
The Dickinson Press obtained a preliminary list of about 40 sites for which citizens have requested further review. The places include specific sites with drilling planned on them, like in Killdeer, and larger areas that people have pre-emptively requested be saved from any future plans.
Killdeer Mountains and several other western North Dakota sites are on the list. A set of some of the sites is part of the Prairie Legacy Wilderness plan, which calls for permanently protecting about 4 percent of the Dakota Prairie Grasslands.
“While oil and gas development historically forecasts a boom-and-bust economic scenario, permanently protected public land … offers insightful long-range benefits,” the proposal states.
In its letter to the governor, the alliance also provided an alternative drilling plan that would move the rest of the planned wells a mile south. That land’s owner approves of the plan because he also supports preserving the Killdeer Mountains, Rob Sand said.
“It’s sort of like this public trust,” he said. “It’s one little part of the mountain that the public has access to.”
If the 3-mile horizontal wells proposed by the alliance work, the oil company and mineral owners could get their oil and gas while keeping off the surface of the mountains, according to the proposal.
Dalrymple has said that with horizontal drilling, there are many opportunities to avoid sensitive areas, but that derricks can still disrupt scenic views.

‘Such an assault’
Sand can still point out the spots on the Killdeer Mountains where he shot his first deer at age 13, and where his mother was born.
But a lot has changed.
He gestures to a nearby house whose occupants now shut their blinds at night to avoid light brought on by an oil well across the road.
“All North Dakotans deserve to know what is at stake here,” Sand and co-coordinator Lori Jepson wrote in their Aug. 7 letter to Dalrymple.
Sand waves at the oil trucks and white pickups that drive by — every few minutes they come — despite his concerns over what they’re doing to his mountains.
After spending time in the mountains growing up, Sand returned with his wife in 2001 to live full time.
“I came back to enjoy the peace and quiet up here,” he said, chuckling at the irony.
The Killdeer Mountains are tough, geologically. Much of their interesting landscape comes from resistance to the erosion that carried away other sediments.
Standing atop one of his favorite rock formations — deemed “Old Ben’s Nose” for its distinct triangular shape — Sand looks out onto the machinery that has popped up.
“It’s such an assault,” he said.
http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/270773/
http://www.thedickinsonpress.com/event/article/id/71189/

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Battle for Killdeer Mountain decided: Foes of drilling near historic site out of options


Published March 13, 2013, 12:00 AM

Battle for Killdeer Mountain decided; Foes of drilling near historic site out of options

FARGO — Oil developers appear to have won the battle for the Killdeer Battlefield, a historic site in the western North Dakota Badlands near where a New York-based company has begun laying groundwork for wells.
By: Dave Kolpack, The Associated Press
FARGO — Oil developers appear to have won the battle for the Killdeer Battlefield, a historic site in the western North Dakota Badlands near where a New York-based company has begun laying groundwork for wells.
Preparations by Hess Corp. come despite objections by some area residents, American Indians, historians and others who wanted further study on the idea before drilling started.
The company’s plans persuaded one couple who live near the Killdeer Mountains to hire an attorney and another couple to join them as leaders of a protest group. But most opposed to the oil development fear it’s too late to stop it.
“I don’t know if it’s a hopeless case yet. It looks that way,” said landowner Rob Sand, whose grandparents once owned the land in western North Dakota where U.S. Army and American Indian soldiers clashed nearly 150 years ago.
Hess officials declined to be interviewed but said in a statement they are “progressing with early site preparation” and expect construction to take place in the coming weeks.
“Hess Corporation is committed to meeting the highest standards of corporate citizenship by protecting the health and safety of our employees, safeguarding the environment and making a positive impact on the communities in which we do business,” the statement said. “We seek to minimize our impact on the environment in all aspects of our operations in North Dakota.”
Sand and his wife, Mary, along with fellow landowners, Loren and Lori Jepson, have led the opposition to the drilling plans and formed the Killdeer Mountain Alliance. The Jepsons have filed unsuccessful appeals with the state Industrial Commission — which granted drilling permits to Hess — but apparently have run out of options.
Thomas Gehrz, attorney for the Jepsons, said a lawsuit doesn’t appear likely at this point because it would cost too much.
“My clients throughout this whole thing have said, ‘Let’s sit down and talk about it.’ We don’t need to make a big fight out of it. We just want our concerns dealt with and we don’t think they’re unreasonable,” Gehrz said. “Hess was apparently not interested.”
The Industrial Commission, made up of Gov. Jack Dalrymple, Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem and Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring, in January approved a request from Hess to drill up to eight wells in the Killdeer Mountains area. The commission later rejected an appeal to reconsider by the Jepsons, who said state Mineral and Resource Director Lynn Helms was biased in his recommendation to approve the new wells in an area where four have already been approved.
“I just can’t predict where it’s going to go,” said Rob Sand, 65. “I have a personal love for the land. I grew up riding horses there and playing all over the place. And I have an interest in history. These things matter.”
Richard Rothaus, a Sauk Rapids, Minn., archaeologist who has an office in Fargo, and Tom Isern, a North Dakota State University history professor, have applied for a National Park Service grant to study the battlefield. They and other historians believe the 1864 skirmish may have been the most important encounter between the U.S. forces and Native Americans.
“For people who are Indian war buffs, this is the fight they should be looking at,” Isern said. “This sets the mold.”
During the one-day battle, Gen. Alfred Sully’s troops essentially formed a giant square with thousands of soldiers on the outside and horses and artillery on the inside. The group marched across the prairie toward Killdeer Mountain and the Dakota village, where U.S. soldiers destroyed tipis, belongings and the winter food supply.
“If you could view it from above, this would be like a Star Wars scene of some sort of futuristic warfare,” Isern said.
Although the U.S. soldiers claimed victory, Rothaus said the experience taught Indian warriors like Sitting Bull and others how to combat mountain howitzers.
“To me, that right there is the start of the war that ends in Little Big Horn and Wounded Knee,” Rothaus said.
Calvin “Bear” First, whose ancestors were among the Indian warriors at Killdeer battle, organized a “wipe away the tears” ceremony at the site in July 2001 to honor the participants and shed light on details from the event. He said the area has cultural meaning to many people and is worried that oil development will diminish its significance.
“The written history doesn’t show how important it really was,” said First, the compliance officer for the Fort Peck Tribes in Montana. “It really shaped the war for what happened after that. And really there are still so many unknowns about that time.”
The North Dakota Senate last month rejected a bill that would have provided a small amount of money to the state Historical Society to study the battlefield. Lawmakers from both parties originally lined up in favor of the bill, but backed off after complaints by some residents who said they didn’t want government in their business.
Rothaus said his study will continue, despite possible damage to the area around the Killdeer Mountain Battlefield, because “there are still large portions of the battlefield left.”
Loren Jepson said he’s mainly worried about oil traffic on what is a main road for Killdeer residents and one where children catch the school bus. He said alternate oil extraction options should have been considered, but “no one was willing to listen.”

This Nov. 25 photo provided by archaeologist Richard Rothaus shows a panoramic view of the Killdeer Mountains Battlefield site in western North Dakota. The historic battlefield is near the site where early oil well site preparations have begun, Hess Corp. said.

http://www.thedickinsonpress.com/event/article/id/66400/

Friday, January 18, 2013

Letter To the Editor: Oppose mountain drilling


Letter To the Editor: Oppose mountain drilling

Posted on 18 January 2013 by Bryce Martin
Dear Editor, We appreciate the many benefits oil development has brought to our area.
Posted Jan. 18, 2013
We’re also concerned about the relentlessness and rapidity of the development, especially when it threatens areas precious to all North Dakotans. The Killdeer Mountains, which include both private and public lands, are among those areas.
We invite everyone who cares about the Killdeer Mountains to join the Killdeer Mountain Alliance:
“The Killdeer Mountain Alliance exists to preserve the cultural, spiritual, ecological, archaeological, and historical integrity of the Killdeer Mountains of western North Dakota and protect them from industrial development that harms the American Indian sites, plant and wildlife habitat, ranching, hunting, tourism, scenic beauty, and recreation for which the Killdeer Mountains are known and loved.”
If you’d like to help protect the Mountains, please contact us: Lori Jepson, 863-6653 or lorijepson@ndsupernet.com. Rob Sand, 863-7263 or killdeermtn@gmail.com.
Sincerely,
Mary Sand

Friday, December 28, 2012

Local residents oppose plan to drill near Killdeer Mountains


Local residents oppose plan to drill near Killdeer Mountains

Posted on 28 December 2012 by admin
A group of concerned Dunn County residents have joined forces with other state-wide interests to form a coalition opposing proposed drilling on public land near the Killdeer Mountains.
Aerial view of Killdeer Mountain.
Aerial view of Killdeer Mountain.
Posted December 28, 2012
BY JENNIFER KOCHER
The group, tentatively called the “Killdeer Mountain Alliance,” will stand together on Jan. 17, 2013, with other concerned citizens, including representatives from local tribes, to hear the North Dakota Industrial Commission’s (NDIC) final decision regarding Hess Corporation’s request to drill up to eight wells on four 1,280-acre spaced units on public school land on the SWSE of Section 25 and 36, T146N and R97W.
The drilling would take place near the 115 square mile circumference of the famed Battle of Killdeer Mountain, in which General Sully’s 3,000 troops defeated a faction of Sioux Indians, leaving between 100 and 150 casualties.
The group’s mission is not to stop the drilling in the area but rather to move it onto the tracts of land in the area that do not pose significant risks to the integrity of the land.
Local ranchers Loren and Ross Jepson originally contested the drilling of these wells at an NDIC hearing on Oct. 24. At this time, the Jepsons raised concerns about the potential overturning of historical artifacts on the land at the proposed drilling sites. They also raised questions about the safety risks posed by an increase in traffic.
“Our grandchildren wait on that corner for the school bus,” said Lori Jepson, wife of Loren. “There are several blind curves in the road and it’s a dangerous spot to see increased truck traffic.”
Because the land in question is owned by the state, as opposed to being federal land, there is no requirement for a complete archeological survey prior to drilling. Given the prospective marring of historically significant land, the state Historical Society has come out against drilling in the area.
Others, such as Anne Marguerite Coyle, also plan to attend the Jan. 14 hearing in opposition of the current proposed drilling on this state land.
Coyle, an associate professor at Jamestown College, warns against the irreversible long-terms effects of drilling in the area.
“This is a living culture. Many people still return to these sacred lands for healing and to pay reverence,” said Coyle. “This isn’t just about protecting a chunk of Civil War history; rather, it’s about protecting a valuable piece of our culture, both past and present.”
Lori Jepson concurs. Although state law requires that all drilling cease upon the discovery of historical artifacts, there is no provision in place to protect against the potential of discovery. Once the site has been overturned, there’s no going back.
“It’s important that we understand that it’s not reversible. It’s the responsibility of the state to protect our best interests,” Jepson said.
Others, such as neighbor Rob Sand, have a personal connection to the land. Sand’s parents homesteaded in the region and he and his siblings had the advantage of growing up in a pristine area rich with fond memories.
“Many of us out here feel a responsibility to protect the land,” Sand said.
The effort to preserve this area from proposed drilling also raises questions about the oil well permit process itself. According to Lori Jepson, their family was not even aware of four of the proposed drilling areas near their home until they noticed the areas had been staked, at which point they approached the NDIC to protest the location.
“We had to hire a lawyer simply for advice on how to protest,” Jepson said. “The oil companies have a team of expert witnesses and we were not aware that we needed them to voice our objections and have them taken seriously.”
“It might be too late for us,” Jepson said. “But it’s important that others know what they need to do if they find themselves in the same boat.”
A representative from the NDIC was not available for comment. The case is scheduled to go before the commission in Bismarck on Jan. 17, 2013, and the public is invited to attend.

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Parts of North Dakota can be saved


Published November 17, 2012, 12:00 AM

Letter: Parts of North Dakota can be saved

The economic boom that North Dakota is experiencing is at a cost.
We recently protested drilling on the Killdeer Mountains in front of the Industrial Commission.
The global view depicted in the dramatic aerial rig photos in the hearing room does not represent what takes place on the ground.

Our contributions to the hearing in October were limited due to lack of expert witnesses in the areas of topography, transportation, archeology, fire services and wildlife management. As local residents, we experienced a sense of fatigued frustration.

A lawyer for Hess Corp. asked that letters of support and testimony be disregarded as hearsay.
Expert witnesses from Hess Corp. were unable to answer basic questions brought forth by the Industrial Commission. They noted that the oil pad locations were selected due to serious topography issues and the selected placement would maximize the economic recovery, prevent waste, prevent unnecessary drilling and preserve the pristine environment.

These statements, however noble, are reiterated verbatim at the close of each proposal leading me to think they are lip service rather than real concern.

As non-experts, we can address the statement promised by the experts.

School Superintendent Gary Wilz, my husband and son identified serious topographic issues with the road.

The intersection is partially blind and the grade steep. The hazard would be multiplied by the dramatic increase in traffic with the proposed well sites for all travelers and especially for children waiting at this intersection for the bus.

Currently, staked sites would prevent easy access for fire control. The number and proposed sites would affect wildlife habitat. This school land is open to the public and would be irreparably altered.
Economic recovery was noted, but we asked the commission to consider local industry: ranching, farming, tourism, hunting as well as oil recovery as economic gain for North Dakota.

With alternate sites reviewed, our question to the board would be — who looks out for the interest of North Dakotans.

Conversations with Game and Fish, the Historical Society and legislators lead me to believe that we can save parts of North Dakota. Hopefully this protest creates a more collaborative decision-making policy and that this area would be considered worthy of further attention.


Lori Jepson, Killdeer