Sunday, September 29, 2013

Family steadfast on battlefield protection

Family steadfast on battlefield protection

Since August, we have read with great interest articles, editorials and letters to the editor about the Killdeer Mountain Battlefield site, etc.
We sure appreciated seeing another side to the story in the editorial titled “State shouldn’t pick winners” in the Sept. 16 Tribune.
We do have some light to shed on the concerns of the United Tribes of North Dakota, reported on KFYR news on Sept. 11 and reported in the Dickinson Press (“Tribes against power line at Killdeer site”) and in the Tribune (“Tribes opposing Basin project in battlefield”) on Sept. 12.
In 1998, Calvin “Bear” First Jr. from the Fort Peck Sioux Treaty Council and a descendant of Medicine Bear, who fought here at the Killdeer Mountains, contacted us asking if he and other tribal members could come here and hold ceremonies to properly bury the warriors and others who died during the battle.
We opened our property and our home to them from 1998 to 2001 and were honored to witness and be a part of the Releasing of the Spirit Ceremony held in 1999 and the Wiping of the Tears Ceremony held in 2001. Members of Sioux tribes from Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Canada, as well as the Three Affiliated Tribes, were on hand to witness these ceremonies (see the Dickinson Press on Aug. 11, 1999, and the Tribune on Aug. 15, 2001, in which Calvin First Sr. is quoted: “Now the old people are happy. When we were here three years ago, we heard the old people crying and hollering from the hills. They’re hollering no more.”).
Through the years, the Dvirnak family has worked diligently to protect and preserve the Killdeer Battlefield area. Rest assured, we will continue to protect and preserve the Killdeer Battlefield site, the battlefield area and our ranch as we have in the past.

Development Disturbs Significant Cultural Site at Killdeer Mountain

Dennis Neumann, United Tribes Technical College
An oil well pad overlooks the Killdeer Battlefield Historic Site near the small lake in the background.

Development Disturbs Significant Cultural Site at Killdeer Mountain

DAKOTA WIND
9/29/13
Killdeer Mountain as a natural land feature is hardly worth commenting on in a land where the horizon is more sky than earth. The rock appears to break out of the surrounding earth like the reach of a tired hand after a stretch and yawn. The plateau is flat and even, as if a great knife had cut the top of some mountain, as a child might decapitate a flower with a stick, but where the top of this mountain is anyone’s guess.
Plains Indian tribes have been coming here for hundreds of years. An old campsite on the southwest side of Killdeer Mountain is littered with tertiary flakes of Knife River flint, hinting that the plateau has born witness to a continual cultural occupation for thousands of years.
In those long years, untold generations of young men have ascended this step to heaven to pray, to look out upon the unmarked beautiful landscape, to look through the veil of sky above and bear witness to the vast mystery of creation. And so, Killdeer Mountain became a special place, a sanctuary, a natural cathedral.
The Lakȟóta call this special place Taȟčá Wakutėpi, Where They Kill Deer. Their name doesn’t take away from the sacredness of the site, but it was a name that noted it was a place they came annually to hunt, and in that hunt too, offer thanksgiving.
Another nation, whose cultural occupation of the area reaches back a thousand years, the Nu’Eta (Mandan) have a cultural story of a figure in their long tradition who brought his staff down upon the mountain in retaliation and broke the single plateau into two. Broken cracked rock lay about the entire step as if in testimony to this long ago punishment.
The Lakȟóta call July Čhaŋpȟasapa Wi, or The Month of Ripe Chokecherries. Late in this month the Lakȟóta came to Taȟčá Wakutėpi to hunt. It was late July 1864, when the Lakȟóta men were hunting and the women were gathering chokecherries in preparation for the long winter. It was a time of year, no different than any of the thousands of Čhaŋpȟasapa Wi before, only this time a great cloud of dust appeared to the southeast of Killdeer. It turned out that it wasn’t a gang of bison.
General Sully knew this day as July 28. Sully brought with him a force of about 2,200 men and he was looking for a fight. His objectives were to engage and punish any hostile Sioux who partook in the 1862 Minnesota Dakota Conflict, and to utterly destroy their food stock and camps.
The Lakȟóta say that a lone warrior rode out and taunted the soldiers. Sully ordered this lone rider killed immediately and set his sharpshooters upon this task. Truly, Sully engaged in battle without parley and as though there were no other alternative. At the end of the day as many as 150 Lakȟóta lie dead or dying on the field. Children who were inadvertently left behind in the wild melee were set upon and murdered to the last and their delicate scalps ripped from their precious heads.
The North Dakota Industrial Commission looked past the majesty of this step, looked beyond the site held sacred for thousands of years, and looked through the tragedy of conflict. In a series of public hearings, the ND Industrial Commission heard from landowners, historians, archaeologists, and tribal representatives. Despite overwhelming support from the public who went to the hearings, the ND Industrial Commission approved over fifty wells in the Killdeer Mountain conflict “study” area.
In a recent development, Basin Electric has requested to install a transmission line and substation in their petition ND PSC Case #: PU-11-696. This new line and substation are in response to the growing power requirements in northwestern North Dakota. Basin Electric’s plan calls for construction over two years in the Killdeer Mountain conflict “study” area beginning in 2014.
The North Dakota Public Service Commission recently held three public hearings in regard to Basin Electric’s proposal. Comments from the State Historical Society of North Dakota are lukewarm, acknowledging Basin Electric’s plan and that a future assessment of the cultural resources within the “study” area will mandate those future project.
On September 12, 2013, during the annual tribal summit hosted at United Tribes Technical College, tribal chairmen from the five tribes of North Dakota, the federally recognized Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate (Lake Traverse Sioux Tribe), the Spirit Lake Oyate (Devil’s Lake Sioux), the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa, and the Three Affiliated Tribes (Arikara, Hidatsa, and Mandan Nation), signed a resolution opposing the disturbance of Killdeer Battlefield State Historic Site.
The politics and value of Killdeer Mountain are still up for discussion. The battle for preserving Killdeer Mountain needs more voices from Indian Country to stand in unity with the landowners, historians, and archaeologists who want to save it.
Meanwhile, people are still going to Killdeer Mountain to pray. Prayer flags testify to a quiet but sure presence; native pilgrims ascend heaven’s step to pray. Hikers ascend too, maybe not in prayer, but to appreciate the stark beauty of this natural cathedral.
Dakota Wind is a theologian by education and a public historian by trade. He has been by turns a National Park Service ranger, a state park ranger, and a college instructor. Wind maintains the history blog The First Scout.

Saturday, September 28, 2013

Dvirnak: Family working to protect and preserve Killdeer Mountain Battlefield site

Published September 28, 2013, 12:00 AM

Dvirnak: Family working to protect and preserve Killdeer Mountain Battlefield site

Since August, we have read with great interest, articles, editorials and letters to the editor about the Killdeer Mountain Battlefield site, etc.
By: Craig and Rhonda Dvirnak, Letter to the Editor

Since August, we have read with great interest, articles, editorials and letters to the editor about the Killdeer Mountain Battlefield site, etc.

We sure appreciated seeing another side to the story in the editorial entitled: “State shouldn’t pick winners” in the Bismarck Tribune on Sept. 16.

We do have some light to shed on the concerns of the United Tribes of North Dakota, reported on KFYR news on Sept. 11 and reported in The Dickinson Press (“Tribes against power line at Killdeer site”) and in the Bismarck Tribune (“Tribes opposing Basin project in battlefield”) on Sept. 12.

In 1998, Calvin “Bear” First Jr., from the Fort Peck Sioux Treaty Council and a descendant of Medicine Bear, who fought here at the Killdeer Mountains, contacted us asking if he and other tribal members could come here and hold ceremonies to properly bury the warriors and others that died during the battle.

We opened our property and our home to them from 1998 to 2001 and were honored to witness and be a part of the Releasing of the Spirit Ceremony held in 1999 and the Wiping of the Tears Ceremony held in 2001.

Members of Sioux tribes from Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Canada and the Three Affiliated Tribes also were on hand to witness these ceremonies. See The Dickinson Press on Aug. 11, 1999, and the Bismarck Tribune on Aug. 15, 2001, where Calvin First Sr. is quoted: “Now the old people are happy, when we were here three years ago, we heard the old people crying and hollering from the hills. They’re hollering no more.”

Through the years the Dvirnak family has worked diligently to protect and preserve the Killdeer Battlefield area.

Rest assured, we will continue to protect and preserve the Killdeer Battlefield site, the battlefield area and our ranch as we have in the past.


Craig and Rhonda Dvirnak,
Killdeer

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Another Sacred Site in Danger: Property Owner Fights to Protect Cave

Colin Fogarty/Northwest News Network
This artwork is in the cave in Wishram, Washington. The same cave Bonneville Power Administration wants to build a taller tower near.

Another Sacred Site in Danger: Property Owner Fights to Protect Cave

9/25/13
What started as a search for a retirement property has turned into a David vs. Goliath fight to save a sacred site on the Columbia River for Robert Zornes, an RV-park owner from Forks, Washington.
“I kept seeing this property, 122 acres on more than a mile of the Columbia River for a quarter-million dollars, then it’s lowered to copy00,000. And I am thinking, ‘This has to be a practical joke,’ ” Zornes toldThe Seattle Timesin July. He bought the property from a real estate website in 2011.
It wasn’t until later that he realized what he bought—one of the state’s richest spots for history and archaeology. It’s the site of a cave with Indian rock art, burials, petroglyphs and story stones.
NPRrecently detailed the rock art of four humanlike figures that are painted in red inside the cave set in a rocky hillside in Wishram, Washington.
Zornes being a history buff has been fighting, along with the Yakama Indian Nation, to save the property and the sacred site.
Bonneville Power Administration already has a 190-foot-tall tower near the cave. It now wants to install a new tower “virtually on top of the cave” according to Zornes. That tower will measure 243 feet tall and will have 22 lines instead of three. It will also have a larger footing and would require blasting to set it into the cliff.
BPA says it wants to use the tower that’s already there.
“It’s much like repaving an old highway; are you better off moving it, or leaving in the same place?” said Larry Bekkedahl, senior vice president for transmission services at BPA, in theJuly story. “In this case we have chosen using the existing line, because it had lesser impacts than trying to find other routes that would move the line on both sides and have a new river crossing, as well as time delays. So the bottom line is we would reuse the existing line and not relocate it to another location.”
But some disagree.
“This is not just repaving,” Allyson Brooks, Washington’s State Historic Preservation Officer, toldThe Seattle Timesin July. “It is the equivalent of taking a two-lane road and making it a superhighway. It is not the same thing. Maybe in essence, but in size and impact, it is greater.”
Zornes has been fighting the taller tower since he bought the property and explained further what it would do in a comment on the recent NPR story:
“It is a facture type of cave in basalt and BPA will [be] blasting with dynamite a crater 38’ deep and 100’ wide. The cave will be less than 70’ away and just below the blasted area. There is valid concern the cave will be destroyed in the construction process.”
There are similar controversies going on elsewhere like in the Mojave Desert, Killdeer Mountain in North Dakota and many tribes oppose the Keystone pipeline.
“If we can stop Bonneville, it will send a message that these cultural sites are worth protecting,” Zornes told NPR.

Read more athttp://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/09/25/another-sacred-site-danger-property-owner-fights-protect-cave-151449

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Battle Lines & Power Lines: The Never-Ending Fight Over Killdeer Mountain

Dennis Neumann, United Tribes Technical College
An oil well pad overlooks the Killdeer Battlefield Historic Site near the small lake in the background.

Battle Lines & Power Lines: The Never-Ending Fight Over Killdeer Mountain

9/24/13
Energy developers continue their assault on the 1864Taĥċa Wakutėpi(Killdeer Mountain) battlefield, where Union Brig. General Alfred Sully’s troops massacred Lakota/Dakota warriors, women, children and elders and destroyed their lodges, crops and food supplies.
Basin Electric Power Cooperative has proposed building a 200-mile, 345-kV transmission line from Antelope Valley Station north of Beulah, North Dakota, to a substation near Tioga.
The proposed transmission line runs right through the battlefield.
“About five years ago, I attended a dedication of some of the artifacts from the battlefield to Dickinson State University…. Killdeer Mountain landowner Alick Dvirnak said there were Lakota/Dakota people buried up there [on his land, on which his family had lived since 1919]. He told me how to find the burial,” said United Tribes Technical College President Dr. David Gipp.
“While we talk about the battlefield and its significance, it is more than that to Lakota and other peoples. It was a place where our people died. We need to invoke the rights of humanity and ensure proper treatment of the dead,” Gipp said.
On September 12, the United Tribes of North Dakota issued a resolution opposing “further development that would disturb the Killdeer Mountains Battlefield site or that would disturb the remains of the many Teton Native Americans killed at the site.”
Dakota Goodhouse, an enrolled member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, says, “If this was [a different Civil War-related battlefield, such as] Gettysburg or Antietam, the public outcry would be so great there wouldn’t even be a discussion” about energy development.
Goodhouse notes that the National Park Service'’ American Battlefield Program has just funded a two-year study of the site to determine its eligibility for inclusion in the National Registry of Historic Places. Principal investigator, North Dakota State University Distinguished Professor and founding director of the university’s Center for Heritage Renewal, Tom Isern, says in the center’s submission to the North Dakota Public Service Commission, “The Killdeer Mountain Battlefield, where Dakota and Lakota fighters fought the Northwest Expedition of Brigadier General Alfred Sully, is an exceedingly significant historic site worthy of preservation and respect. Unfortunately, proposals here under review call for a power transmission line to be built across the core of the battlefield. This is an unacceptable denigration of the integrity of the site.”
Isern told ICTMN that the battlefield is likely the most important historical site in the state and perhaps he had not stated his objections to the transmission line strongly enough.
Basin Electric is also building power plants in North Dakota. The growth in electricity supply and transmission capacity is fueled by increasing demand from drilling operations in the Bakken oil fields. The “Williston Basin Oil and Gas Related Electrical Load Growth Forecast” released in October 2012 found that electricity demand in the 22 North Dakota counties most affected by oil and gas development in the Williston Basin and Bakken Formation would triple to 3,030 MW by 2032. The same report estimated that the number of oil wells in the state would increase from 5,000 in 2011 to as many as 40,000 in 2031.
Basin Electric spokesman Daryl Hill says the company did due diligence regarding the route and no mention was made of the National Park Service study. Notifying the tribes of the proposed project was the responsibility of the USDA’s Rural Electric Service during preparation of the Environmental Impact Study, he notes. The draft EIS shows 14 tribes were notified, but Hill says he does not know of any comments from the tribes. The company did remove a substation when they found it was in the NPS study area.
This is a map of Basin Electric’s proposed route overlaid on the battlefield site. Basin Electric's map, which is published in the Draft EIS and on their website, does not show the battlefield or study area.
This is a map of Basin Electric’s proposed route overlaid on the battlefield site. Basin Electric's map, which is published in the Draft EIS and on their website, does not show the battlefield or study area.
On reports that there is an alternative route that would avoid the battlefield, Hill says such a route was considered in the preparation of the EIS, but was not part of Basin Electric’s proposal to the North Dakota PSC. The EIS, he explains, is one document the PSC will consider, but no alternative route is included in Basin Electric’s planning.
Hill says Basin Electric plans to walk the route and conduct an archaeological survey that would include a magnetometer study for each area where a tower would be constructed. That study, he says, should identify any burials that might be disturbed.
The North Dakota PSC has just finished public hearings on the project. The North Dakota Transmission Authority commissioned the electricity demand study, which was supported by Basin Electric and Montana-Dakota Utilities through the North Dakota Petroleum Council.

Read more athttp://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/09/24/battle-lines-power-lines-never-ending-fight-over-killdeer-mountain-151408

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Battlefield Preservation viewpoint from an 11th grade student.

Essay Contest 2012 Second Place, Senior Entry

Joe Stephan, 11th Grade

"The past reminds us of timeless human truths and allows for the perpetuation of cultural traditions that can be nourishing; it contains examples of mistakes to avoid, preserves the memory of alternatives ways of doing things, and is the basis for self-understanding..."  This quote from Bettina Drew summarizes the importance of preserving history.  It is crucial for generations after the Civil War to have access to information about the battlefields, legacy, and significance of such a defining period in American history.  Battlefield preservation is an irreplaceable supplement to general knowledge because it provides essential context and other information that cannot be properly conveyed with words alone.  The ultimate importance of preservation efforts lies in the fact that the efforts provide a basis for how American life developed into what it is today.

http://www.civilwar.org/education/contests-quizzes/essay-contest/2012-essay-contest/essay-contest-2012-second-1.html

Drew, Bettina. "Quotations on the Importance of History and Historic Preservation." National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers. National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers. Web. 24 Apr. 2012. http://www.ncshpo.org/current/quotes.htm.

Monday, September 16, 2013

Development Disturbs Significant North Dakota Historical Site


Development Disturbs Significant North Dakota Historical Site
Development Disturbs Significant Cultural Site
Killdeer Mountain: Sacred Site, Battle Field, Oil Rich
By Dakota Wind

Monday, September 16, 2013
 
Killdeer, N.D. – Killdeer Mountain as a natural land feature is hardly worth commenting on in a land where the view is more sky than earth. The rock appears to break out of the surrounding earth like the reach of a tired hand after a stretch and yawn. The plateau is flat and even, as if a great knife had cut the top of some mountain, as a child might decapitate a flower with a stick, but where the top of this mountain is, is anyone’s guess.
Plains Indian tribes have been coming here for ages. An old campsite on the south west side Killdeer Mountain is littered with tertiary flakes of Knife River flint, evidence that the plateau has born witness to a continual cultural occupation for thousands of years.
In those long years, untold generations of young men have ascended this step to heaven to pray, to look out upon the unmarked beautiful landscape, to look through the veil of sky above and bear witness to the vast mystery of creation. And so, Killdeer Mountain became a special place, a sanctuary, a natural cathedral.
The Lakȟóta call this special place Taȟčá Wakutėpi, Where They Kill Deer. Their name doesn’t take away from the sacredness of the site, but it was a name that notes it is a place they came to annually to hunt, and in that hunt too, offer thanksgiving.

At the top of Killdeer Mountain is a cave that descends over a hundred feet. Lakota oral tradition holds that some of the people escaped General Sully's assault by climbing down and then navigating through the series of caves and emerging west of the plateau. The cave is called Medicine Hole.
Another nation, whose cultural occupation of the area reaches back a thousand years, the Nu’Eta (Mandan), have a cultural story of a figure in their long tradition who brought his staff down upon the mountain in retaliation and broke the single plateau into two. Broken cracked rock lay about the entire step as if in testimony to this long ago punishment.
The Lakȟóta call July Čhaŋpȟasapa Wi, or The Month Of Ripe Chokecherries. Late in this month, in the year the Lakota call in the Long Soldier winter count First Fight With White Men, the Lakȟóta came to Taȟčá Wakutėpi to hunt. It was late July, 1864, when the Lakȟóta men were hunting and the women were gathering chokecherries in preparation for the long winter. It was a time of year, no different than any of the thousands of Čhaŋpȟasapa Wi before, only this time a great cloud of dust appeared to the south east of Killdeer. It turned out that it wasn’t a gange of bison.
General Sully knew this day as July 28, and he brought with him a force of about 2,200 men and he was looking for a fight. His objectives were to engage and punish any hostile Sioux who partook in the 1862 Minnesota Dakota Conflict, and to utterly destroy their food stock and camps.
The Lakȟóta say that a lone warrior rode out and taunted the soldiers. Sully ordered this lone rider killed immediately and set his sharpshooters upon this task. Truly, Sully engaged in battle without parley as though there were no other alternative. At the end of the day, as many as 150 Lakȟóta lie dead or dying on the field. Children who were inadvertently left behind in the wild melee were set upon and murdered to the last, their delicate scalps carved from their precious heads.

A map outlining the oil wells, some on private, some on state owned lots, on which the North Dakota Industrial Commission approved. 
The North Dakota Industrial Commission looked past the majesty of this step, looked beyond the site held sacred for thousands of years, and looked through the tragedy of conflict. In a series of public hearings, the ND Industrial Commission heard from landowners, historians, archaeologists, and tribal representatives. Despite overwhelming support from the public who went to the hearings, the ND Industrial Commission approved over fifty wells in the Killdeer Mountain conflict “study” area.
In a recent development, Basin Electric has requested to install a transmission line and substation in their petition ND PSC Case #: PU-11-696. This new line and substation are in response to the growing power requirements in northwestern North Dakota. Basin Electric’s plan calls for construction over two years in the Killdeer Mountain conflict “study” area beginning in 2014.
The North Dakota Public Service Commission recently held three public hearings in regard to Basin Electric’s proposal. Comments from the State Historical Society of North Dakota are luke-warm, acknowledging Basin Electric’s plan and that a future assessment of the cultural resources within the “study” area will mandate future projects.

A map of Basin Electric's proposal. 
On September 12, 2013, during the annual tribal summit hosted at United Tribes Technical College, tribal chairmen from the five tribes of North Dakota, the federally recognized Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate (Lake Traverse Sioux Tribe), the Spirit Lake Oyate (Devil’s Lake Sioux), the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa, and the Three Affiliated Tribes (Arikara, Hidatsa, and Mandan Nation), signed a resolution opposing the disturbance of Killdeer Battlefield State Historic Site.  
The politics and value of Killdeer Mountain are still up for discussion. The battle for preserving Killdeer Mountain needs more voices from Indian Country to stand in unity with the landowners, historians, and archaeologists who want to save it.

Meanwhile, people are still going to Killdeer Mountain to pray. Prayer flags testify to a quiet but sure presence; native pilgrims ascend heaven’s step to pray. Hikers ascend too, maybe not in prayer, but to appreciate the stark beauty of this natural cathedral.

State shouldn’t choose winners, losers in oil patch

State shouldn’t choose winners, losers in oil patch

September 16, 2013 2:00 am  • 



Moves to preserve the Killdeer Mountain battlefield site have raised important questions about private property rights, development and historic preservation.
Agreed, the battlefield has significant historical and cultural value for many people, including the state Indian tribes. However, the battlefield isn’t public property. It’s private land. It has belonged to the same ranching family since 1928. North Dakotans historically have been protective of private property rights and anyone interested in overriding them will find a rough road.
It’s all an issue because the Basin Electric Power Cooperative has asked the North Dakota Public Service Commission for permission to run a transmission line across the battlefield. The co-op recently withdrew a request to place a substation there, in an effort to appease opposition. Basin would pay the property owners for the necessary easements.
Several groups have asked the PSC to deny Basin’s routing of the power line across the battlefield.
The PSC’s decision-making process has been complicated by the National Park Service, which provided $90,000 from its American Battlefield Protection Program to study the battlefield site for possible inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The idea, it appears, is to slow down the PSC’s decision-making process. A similar study was proposed to the North Dakota Legislature, but that body declined to fund it.
Battlefield owner Craig Dvirnak is neutral on the transmission line and opposed to the study. He and some of the other landowners in the area have been left out of the discussion. That seems to be a colossal mistake.
If government restricts the use of Dvirnak’s six sections, over his objections, would it be considered a taking? How would he be compensated? Who would compensate him?
There’s no obvious public or private group waiting in the wings to make an offer to purchase Dvirnak’s property for the sake of preservation, even if he were a willing seller and, from his public comments, that seems unlikely.
It’s important to note that Craig Dvirnak and his family have been generous about allowing people interested in Killdeer Mountain battlefield to have reasonable access to the site. Not too long ago, the family donated artifacts found on the site to Dickinson State University. They have been good stewards of the battlefield.
North Dakota’s Indian tribes asked the PSC to deny Basin’s requests.
It’s a mess.
Basin Electric has a history of being a good corporate citizen — after all it’s member-owned.
The co-op has worked in good faith with the landowner and the PSC.
It was guided by the Legislature’s rejection of the study.
If the battlefield needed to be preserved, local and state government, along with private citizens, should have raised the funds to ensure its future.
If they want to preserve it now, those same parties must work with the landowner to achieve their goal.
There are ways that would allow the Dvirnak family to continue to farm the battlefield without putting it at risk.
The PSC should not use the preservation of the battlefield to reject Basin’s proposal without knowing that there are means and methods in place to to do so, and that the Dvirnaks would be agreeable.
We stand firm with the landowner.

http://bismarcktribune.com/news/opinion/editorial/state-shouldn-t-choose-winners-losers-in-oil-patch/article_168958f2-1ca5-11e3-b1a4-0019bb2963f4.html

http://www.basinelectric.com/News_Center/Publications/News_About_Us/state-shouldnt-choose-winners,-losers-in-oil-patch.html

Friday, September 13, 2013

United Tribes of North Dakota Oppose Killdeer Development


United Tribes of North Dakota Oppose Killdeer Development

September 13, 2013
On September 6, the United Tribes of North Dakota said it officially opposed any further development on Killdeer Mountain by way of a resolution, which passed unanimously.
Their opposition is because the site is sacred and they don’t want any remains there disturbed. On July 28, 1864 a peaceful encampment of Teton Natives was at the sacred site at Killdeer when they were attacked by the U.S. Army under Brigadier General Alfred Sully.
“An undetermined number of Native American men, women and children were killed, accompanied by the destruction of between 1,600 and 1,800 lodges they occupied… as a part of a continuing effort by the U.S. military to stamp out all resistance by Native Americans to U.S. domination of Indian country in Minnesota, Dakota Territory and further west; an effort which would now be called a war of genocide,” reads the resolution. “The Tetons that managed to escape the horrors of the so-called ‘Battle’ in the Killdeer Mountains in Dakota Territory were unable to ever give their relatives the appropriate burial ceremonies, with many bodies being buried in a long line along the hills where they were killed.”
The attack also destroyed tons of buffalo meat, piles of tanned hides, clothes, utensils and tipi poles.
The United Tribes of North Dakota, which represents the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate, the Spirit Lake Tribe, the Standing Rock Tribe, Mandan/Hidatsa/Arikara Nation and the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa, worry that the proposed construction of an electric power transmission line “could potentially disturb the remains of those killed at the site.”

Read more at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/09/13/united-tribes-north-dakota-oppose-killdeer-development-151269

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Power-hungry Oil Patch creates need for controversial power line

Power-hungry Oil Patch creates need for controversial power line

Amy Dalrymple, Forum News Service
WILLISTON, N.D. – The need for power in oil-producing counties is projected to grow more than 1,000 megawatts by 2025, but a proposed transmission line to deliver that electricity is drawing environmental and cultural concerns.
The Public Service Commission held a third and final hearing Thursday in Williston on Basin Electric Power Cooperative’s proposed 197-mile transmission line to meet the power demands in the Oil Patch.
The 345-kilovolt transmission line starts at the Antelope Valley Station near Beulah, heads west through Killdeer, north through Williston and ends at a substation near Tioga.
Connie Triplett, a state senator from Grand Forks who also serves with the grassroots group the Badlands Conservation Alliance, asked commissioners to send Basin Electric back to the drawing board.
Triplett said the company should find an alternative that avoids sensitive areas such as the Badlands, the Killdeer Mountain Battlefield area and the area outside of Theodore Roosevelt National Park. Triplett said the peace and solitude of the national park is already being disturbed by construction, oil wells and natural gas flaring outside the park boundaries.
“A gigantic power line is just another thing in a long line,” Triplett said. “At some point, the cumulative effect adds up to a greatly diminished experience.”
Anne Marguerite Coyle, biology professor for Jamestown College who has researched golden eagles in the Killdeer area, testified that the transmission line would have a high impact on wildlife in the area. In particular, the route is a dense nesting area for golden eagles, Coyle said.
Cris Miller, environmental administrator for Basin Electric, said the company is working to minimize the environmental and cultural impact of the project. The amount of land that will be permanently lost after the project is complete is 1 acre, Miller said.
Public Service Commissioner Julie Fedorchak pointed out that the word “loss” is subjective and others may view it differently than Miller.
Basin Electric has committed to relocate a proposed substation that would have been in the study area to determine the boundaries of the Killdeer Mountain Battlefield.
“It was the responsible thing to do,” said Curt Pearson, a company spokesman.

Tribes opposing Basin project in battlefield

Tribes opposing Basin project in battlefield

All of North Dakota’s Native American tribes say they are opposed to a Basin Electric Power Cooperative transmission line the co-op plans to build through the heart of the historic Killdeer Mountain battlefield.
The five tribes sent notice of their opposition to the Public Service Commission, which is holding the last of three public hearings on the project today in Williston.
The tribes’ unanimous vote of resolution was signed by Three Affiliated Tribes chairman Tex Hall and Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate chairman Robert Shepherd, according to a statement issued Wednesday by the United Tribes of North Dakota. The two are chairman and secretary respectively of United Tribes.
Basin is planning to build a new 200-mile transmission line to carry some 500 megawatts of electricity from its lignite-fired Antelope Valley Station near Beulah into the oil patch west of Killdeer, through Watford City, Williston and over to Tioga.
About eight miles of the line would pass through an area designated for study under the National Park Service’s American Battlefield Program. The North Dakota State University-led study could lead to the battlefield being listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
News of the study came just days before the first PSC hearing in Killdeer last week, and Basin quickly moved to pull a planned substation out of the battlefield area.
Basin spokesman Curt Pearson said the tribes’ opposition to the project is a significant comment. He said Basin is considering a number of options, including moving the line off the field of battle, but, “We haven’t heard anyone say this is not needed. I don’t think that’s in question.”
The oil patch has a huge appetite for electricity and Basin forecasts the region’s peak demand will grow from 800 megawatts now to more than 2,000 megawatts in the next decade. The co-op said the first of three new gas-fired, 45-megatwatt power plants went on line in the oil patch last week.
It could be two months before the PSC approves a route permit for the transmission. Its approval will likely be contingent on federal approval of an Environmental Impact Statement, which is expected in March 2014. The environmental OK is required because Basin plans to use federal financing for the $375 million project.
Basin said it has already acquired more than
75 percent of the landowner easements for the transmission line and would be out the money if the line, or a portion, is relocated. It has also said it may build yet a second transmission line on the east side of the Killdeer Mountains to serve the oil patch.
The tribes say their opposition is based on the possibility that construction “could potentially disturb the remains of those killed at the site. Those who managed to escape were unable to give relatives appropriate burial ceremonies and many bodies remain buried at the site.”
Tom Isern, who will lead the NDSU study, said the 1864 Battle of the Killdeer Mountains was the largest engagement of military and Native Americans in the Great Plains. Today it is marked by a small monument maintained by the State Historic Society.

http://bismarcktribune.com/news/state-and-regional/tribes-opposing-basin-project-in-battlefield/article_b6c1308e-1b78-11e3-bc25-001a4bcf887a.html

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Gall

Gall was born in 1840 along the Moreau River west of the Missouri River in present day South Dakota. He was a member of the Hunkpapa Lakota, the same as Sitting Bull.
Physically powerful, Gall proved himself early in battle and in the hunt. He gradually became the favorite protégé of Sitting Bull.
Gall initially fought the whites at the Battle of Killdeer Mountain (1864) in present day North Dakota. Later, near Fort Berthold in late 1865 Gall was surrounded, bayoneted and left for dead by soldiers led to his camp by Arikara scout, Bloody Knife. Bloody Knife was kept from shooting Gall's prostate body by the commanding officer. Gall survived.
In the summer of 1872 Gall and Sitting Bull led attacks against the military escort of Northern Pacific Railroad survey parties across southeastern Montana. The next summer in 1873 Gall again led resistance to a second Northern Pacific survey. This time Custer's 7th Cavalry served as escort. Custer's initial fights with northern Plains Indians took place during the 1873 railroad survey.
As a result of the Government ultimatum in December 1875 to come into the reservation or else, Gall led his band from Standing Rock Agency to join Sitting Bull's non-treaty Lakota.
At the Battle of the Little Bighorn, a number of Gall's family, two wives and three children, were killed in Reno's assault on the south end of the village. Gall apparently did not participate in the attack on Reno's retreating troops, but did cross with warriors at Medicine Tail Coulee to first stop and then assault Custer's battalion. He actively participated in the final demise of Custer's battalion.
During the fall and winter of 1876-1877 Sitting Bull's people were constantly harassed by General Miles 5th Infantry. In the spring of 1877, Gall joined Sitting Bull in crossing over to the Wood Mountain area of Canada in what is today southern Alberta.
As the exiled Lakota began to starve, Gall broke with Sitting Bull and returned with a large number of his people to Fort Buford in January 1881. After more defections, Sitting Bull brought the rest of his people into Fort Buford to surrender July 19, 1881.
Gall sided with Standing Rock Indian Agent James McLaughlin in his attempts to get the Sioux to adopt an agrarian life style. He became a leader of the progressive element of the tribe versus the traditionalists who resisted the new ways led by Sitting Bull.
Gall died in present day South Dakota on the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, December 5, 1894.